18 year old dating a 16 year old legality
Pro-life groups expressed dismay Tuesday at the ruling by the U. District Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, where a three-judge panel ordered the girl to be taken to a clinic to have an abortion, and sorrow after the news Wednesday that the abortion had taken place.
And that's why we need to start charging Illegals criminally with steep jail sentences if found guilty.The did not demend that others conform to their wishes. Jane's Due Process, a Texas group that works with minors seeking abortions, said it and other groups had raised private money to pay for the teen's abortion. Does the Abortion now allow that person to seek residency, and as pointed out by others now, she has a " Legal Right to claim persecution " if returned to her country?Ken Paxton, the Texas attorney general, filed an amicus brief in the case, arguing that Texas risked becoming a sanctuary for abortions if the government was forced to pay for the procedure for Jane Doe It threatens to conjure a so-called right to immediate abortion on demand from the U. Constitution, and to recast America, which has historically aspired to be a haven and place of refuge for the most vulnerable, into a destination for abortions."That abortion was authorized by the U. It said lawyers appointed to represent the teen's interests would take her from the South Texas facility where she was being held to and from an abortion clinic. So then the whole " Gambit " was for what purpose and who is the Final Payer for all costs incurred?Fortunately the good guys won and the bible-babbling theocrats lost. The panel's decision, issued Friday, would have postponed the abortion. I suggest you read Roe v Wade, Griswold v CT, and the 5th Amendment.And the ACLU had to get the case to one of their liberal circuit courts: "On Tuesday, the full U. Ummmm.....that's not the issue here, contrary to the totally false claims made by the nutty bible-babbler site which Vic seeded."This is an appalling and unconscionable misuse of taxpayer dollars, and a violation of the principles of the Hyde Amendment.
It threatens to conjure a so-called right to immediate abortion on demand from the U. Constitution, and to recast America, which has historically aspired to be a haven and place of refuge for the most vulnerable, into a destination for abortions." Catholic leaders in Texas had commended the state and federal government for defending the right to life of the unborn child in court, and Bishop Daniel E.
IE: Do " personal Funds " come under " Citizens costs " and are some claimable as Tax deduction, and IF they are, who pays those deductions? utm_term=.8b836cc9db5e Attorneys for the undocumented teenager had asked the full appeals court to rehear her case after the three-judge panel ruled 2 to 1 to give HHS until Oct. That would have allowed her to be released and to seek the abortion without government involvement.
https:// The teenager's lawyers have said all the government needed to do was "get out of the way." An attorney appointed to represent the teen's interests has said she could transport her to and from appointments necessary for the procedure, and the federal government would not have to pay for it.
We will not stop fighting until we have justice for every woman like Jane.”And what precedent would that be?
That a person can come to the US and get a legal medical procedure done?
That way we can offer them a deal at their first hearing that if they agree to leave and not come back they get a suspended sentence.